Skip to main content

World Trade Organization

Today I will start a series of articles about the World Trade Organization (WTO) based on my notes. I hope this will shed some light to those readers who know little about this particular organization and the world trade as a whole.
The history of WTO starts after the World War II when along with other organizations, such as International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (WB), International Trade Organization was about to be created, but instead a General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was signed. So, GATT was signed by 23 nations in Geneva in 1947 and came in force on 1 January 1948. GATT was a de facto International Organization. WTO came into force on 1 January 1995. The WTO Secretariat is in Geneva, Switzerland and is headed by Director General.
In total GATT/WTO held 9 negotiation rounds from 1947 to 1994. The main objective of negotiation rounds is to decrease trade barriers among the WTO Members. In chronological order those rounds are:

1) Geneva - April 1947
2) Annecy - April 1949
3) Torquay - September 1950
4) Geneva II - January 1956
5) Dillon - September 1960
6) Kennedy - May 1964
7) Tokyo - September 1973
8) Uruguay - September 1986
9) Doha - November 2001

The main objectives of WTO include:
- Increase of standards of living
- Attainment of full employment
- The growth of real income and effective demand
- The expansion of production of and trade in goods and services
- Preservation of the environment and needs of developing countries
- Sustainable economic development

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Basic principles of Tariff Classification

Tariff Classification is one of the main areas of Customs Law and is crucial when imposing customs duties. Specific rules on classification can be found in HS Convention to which almost all the WTO Members (except Taipei) are party. HS consists of over 5000 commodity groups with a six-digit code. HS consists of:  (1) Chapter, Heading and Sub-heading Notes; and  (2) General Rules for the Interpretation (GIR) of the Harmonized System.  The first one which is Chapter, Heading and Subheading Notes is the main step to identify the product classification.  The second part, GIR provide certain principles to classify goods:  (i) incomplete or unfinished goods if they don’t have a proper line are classified as finished goods; (ii) when goods are prima facie classifiable under two or more headings, classification shall be effected as follows. (a) A heading that provides a more specific description is to preferred to the more general description; (b) mixtures, c...

Mapping data - Kyrgyzstan Spatial

Recently Institute of Public Policy and Administration of University of Central Asia (IPPA-UCA) and International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) launched the online mapping tool named Kyrgyzstan Spatial (www.kyrgyzstanspatial.org). This application tool is a good way to see the socio-economic and food security situation in Kyrgyzstan. One may view the data on the map and see the regional differences in different sectors on national and sub-national level across time. 

Prison economics. Part II

Following my previous article on the issue of a huge incarceration rates in the US. Let me clarify that I am not trying to defend or justify the imprisoned. The only thing that interests me is the economics behind the crimes/prisons. Earlier in the year, President Obama signed the amnesty for illegal aliens that would forgive undocumented people and as a result award them with legal status (Green Card). This in turn will benefit 12 to 20 million undocumented persons currently being in the US. Looks like the authorities accounted that it is more beneficial as for the state budget in terms of extra taxes to be paid by the new legal aliens (up to 20 mln!), so for the illegal immigrants as well. In 1986 through Immigration and Reform Control Act (IRCA) was the first and only amnesty for a large group of people. Back then it was 2.8 million undocumented aliens. Just imagine the benefits to the state budget from this act. First of all there is no more need to pay $160 per imprisoned ...